Lucifer Abraxas Satan -- How it works rationally and intuitively

~True Esoteric Science~

LUCIFER•ABRAXAS•SATAN

Here is the highest wisdom:

1.Thesis: Lucifer – GOOD.

2.Antithesis: Satan – EVIL.

3.Synthesis: Abraxas – BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL!

Abraxas, unlike Lucifer, completely understands evil and individuation, but he also understands the Oneness. Lucifer is limited because he is obsessed with Oneness and understands only that aspect

of existence. Satan is the opposite and understands only individuation and separation. Abraxas is the True God who understands EVERYTHING, who is not limited by any partisan, restricted view.

Evil is dialectically compulsory. Lucifer thinks it should be abolished entirely, hence fails to understand its dialectical necessity.

Likewise, Satan wants to abolish the One (the union of all beings as equals), so that he can stand as the eternal ruler of the Many.

Inequality is what he seeks, with himself as the First amongst the Unequals. Only Abraxas truly comprehends the dialectic.

So, the final dialectic progression is this:

Thesis: The One = the Good = Light = Lucifer.

Antithesis: The Many = Evil = Darkness = Satan.

Synthesis: The One-Many = Beyond Good and Evil = Light and Darkness = the dialectical Omega Point = Abraxas, the completion of cosmic evolution, the apex of existence, the maximum actualisation of the original cosmic potential, the attainment of Absolute Freedom and Knowledge.

THE TRUE GOD IS NOT DEFINED AS MORALLY PERFECT.

PERFECT GOODNESS IS NOT A PROPERTY OF THE TRUE GOD. That would be to limit him and reveal that he was ignorant of evil, hence incomplete and lacking full knowledge of existence.

Evil defines good. Evil gives good meaning. Evil, in a sense, perfects good. The two must dialectically co-exist until they are finally transcended by the ultimate synthesis in Abraxas.

Abraxas does no evil, though that’s not because he is incapable of it but because it serves no rational purpose when you are the True God. To whom, and why, would he do evil? He is the One-Many. He

understands the needs of the One and the Many. To harm one of the many would be to harm the One itself, hence to harm that aspect of himself. Hence he would never do such a thing. He refrains from evil through knowledge and reason, not through any inherent absence of evil in his character.